lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [rfc] __SMP__ vs. CONFIG_SMP
Hi!

> I would be in favor of patches to change the existing usages of __SMP__
> to CONFIG_SMP, except for the include/ directory. But I think
> global cleanup patches are better in 2.5.1 than the pre-2.4 series
> which is almost here.

That patch is simple enough that I think _now_ is the right time to do
it: kernel base should be changing more slowly these days. That patch
will not hurt anything.
Pavel
--
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents me at discuss@linmodems.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.029 / U:9.404 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site