lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [rfc] __SMP__ vs. CONFIG_SMP
Date
In message <199912260312.VAA23979@duracef.shout.net> you write:
> But if you want to write up a partial patch (like arch/i386 and
> include/i386) and submit it to Linus and get his opinion, go for it.

Note that Linus doesn't eat such patches easily. I submitted a
s/__SMP__/CONFIG_SMP/ patch some months ago and it went nowhere.

CONFIG_SMP everywhere: easier for external module compilation...

Rusty.
--
Hacking time.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.041 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site