[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread

while developing a compiler (,
a problem with newer linux-kernels occured.

I tracked it down to the following:

Using this small program to test it, the executiontime on Linux <= 2.1.126
and on Sparc-Solaris is nearly 1ms.

Since 2.1.127 the time is 5 seconds, whoch means 10ms per sleep(0).

-------------------- 8< ------------------------

int main()
int i;
for (i=0; i<=500; i++)
-------------------- 8< ------------------------

Viewing it in strace results in nanosleep(0,0).
The manpage for nanosleep() says, the (sleep-)time may increase up to one
cycle (10ms) (Linux-man and Solaris-man).

I inserted a line like

if(arg==0) return 0;

to sys_nanosleep() in sched.c, and the "problem" was fixed.

It surely does not make sense to call sleep(0), but in that case,
it would be nice to return emmediatly.

Are there any oposite oppinions ?
Could that fix be included into the official kernel ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.043 / U:2.476 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site