[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread

    while developing a compiler (,
    a problem with newer linux-kernels occured.

    I tracked it down to the following:

    Using this small program to test it, the executiontime on Linux <= 2.1.126
    and on Sparc-Solaris is nearly 1ms.

    Since 2.1.127 the time is 5 seconds, whoch means 10ms per sleep(0).

    -------------------- 8< ------------------------

    int main()
    int i;
    for (i=0; i<=500; i++)
    -------------------- 8< ------------------------

    Viewing it in strace results in nanosleep(0,0).
    The manpage for nanosleep() says, the (sleep-)time may increase up to one
    cycle (10ms) (Linux-man and Solaris-man).

    I inserted a line like

    if(arg==0) return 0;

    to sys_nanosleep() in sched.c, and the "problem" was fixed.

    It surely does not make sense to call sleep(0), but in that case,
    it would be nice to return emmediatly.

    Are there any oposite oppinions ?
    Could that fix be included into the official kernel ?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.019 / U:10.536 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site