lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PCI resource allocation (was Re: Ok, making ready for pre-2.4 and code-freeze..)
   Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:17:23 +0100
From: Martin Mares <mj@suse.cz>

DaveM, does this look reasonable? I've noticed
pdev_assign_unassigned_resources() being passed min_io and min_mem
arguments, but I think we should just adjust resources of the
parent bus instead.

I don't care as I don't use any of the generic bus resource assignment
walking code, this way when it changes my port doesn't break
needlessly. I can never use the generic code until various
assumptions (unsigned char irq types, etc.) are removed from that
code anyways.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.595 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site