Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Dec 1999 11:50:23 +0000 (GMT) | From | Tigran Aivazian <> | Subject | Re: Official ;) fix for the SPECIAL bug |
| |
just for my education - is the value 4 better than 3 for some specific reasons (like 3 is a reserved block request command?) or just because it was already in your patch :)
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > --- fs.h.0 Mon Dec 13 09:27:44 1999 > > +++ fs.h Mon Dec 13 09:28:10 1999 > > The official one that I missed when feeding Linus is > > > diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from ../exclude linux.32p2/include/linux/fs.h linux.ac/include/linux/fs.h > --- linux.32p2/include/linux/fs.h Sun Dec 12 23:42:40 1999 > +++ linux.ac/include/linux/fs.h Sun Dec 12 02:30:42 1999 > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ > #define READ 0 > #define WRITE 1 > #define READA 2 /* read-ahead - don't block if no resources */ > +#define SPECIAL 4 /* For non-blockdevice requests in request queue */ > > #define WRITERAW 5 /* raw write - don't play with buffer lists */ > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |