Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 10 Dec 1999 14:32:04 -0800 | From | Zachary Amsden <> | Subject | Re: Windows 9x and RFC1323 |
| |
Chris Wedgwood wrote: > > > I suggest that tcp_sack be turned off by default unless there is > > some way to detect and work around broken implementations on the > > other of a connection. > > Do you know for sure it broken and not something else going on? I > have SACK enabled on machines that make hundred if not thousands of > connections to both solaris and windows machines every day... if > there are problems, I've not seen them -- but then again, I'm > certainly not looking either.
But how lossy are those connections? In any case, the occasional noosed by SACK connection on the server side looks just like a hung or disconnected client. It when you are the client that you'll notice trouble.
-- Zachary Amsden zamsden@engr.sgi.com (650) 933-6919 09U-510 Core Protocols
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |