Messages in this thread | | | From | Peter Samuelson <> | Date | Wed, 3 Nov 1999 05:18:05 -0600 (CST) | Subject | Re: 2.3.25 bootsect.c dose not compile |
| |
[david] > also why can we not use NASM or the like then we would get nice > looking asm code ?
Nice looking to whom? The i386 boot code was the *only* place in the kernel that didn't use AT&T syntax. Now the whole kernel does. Believe me, AT&T syntax looks just as nice as Intel syntax if you're used to it, and most kernel hackers are....
-- Peter Samuelson <sampo.creighton.edu!psamuels>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |