lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] string.h speedup, cld-2.3.30-A1
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Nov 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > much of the remaining 284 cld's is still unjustified, because '*a = *b;'
> > > type of structure copies are inlined by GCC. (GCC generates a cld because
> > > user-space has to be prepared to be interrupted by uncooperative signal
> > > handlers and the like).
> >
> > What!? A signal handler can change flags? Then there's a lot more for GCC
> > to worry about than the direction flag..
>
> A normal signal handler cannot change flags, because they will obviously
> be restored on signal exit.
>
> However, I'm not sure that "longjmp()" does the same. You'd have to check
> libc souces to see if setjmp saves the flags..
>
> Linus
Libc longjmp() does, glibc longjmp() doesn't.

--
Henrik Olsen, Dawn Solutions I/S URL=http://www.iaeste.dk/~henrik/
No, power off on shutdown is not SMP safe. It kind of happens to work on
a lot of boards. If making that APM call reformats your disk and plays
tetris on an SMP box, the bios vendor is within spec (if a little
peculiar). Alan Cox, on the Linux Kernel list



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.059 / U:19.368 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site