[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: spin_unlock optimization(i386)

On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Erich Boleyn wrote:

> > * you (speculatively) execute read instructions ahead of write
> > instructions.
> > * you do not send write instructions immediately out of the CPU core,
> > they sit in a write buffer.
> I'm starting to doubt myself a bit here (reads being hoisted above writes
> with respect to externally observed stores vs. conflicts with the list of
> uncommitted stores as being the trouble here), so I'm going to just check
> on this one with the folks who implemented it here...

my (fixed) test code doesnt show any causality violation. Manfred's code
is a complex simulation of one given Linux code sequence, Manfred are you
sure it's not buggy?

-- mingo

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.724 / U:3.000 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site