lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Request for comments (kdev_t and friends...)
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Richard Gooch wrote:

> Oliver Xymoron writes:
> > In fact, we should add at least a void *private so that devices can
> > be freed of managing their instance data with static arrays indexed
> > off minor number.
>
> With devfs this is really clean. A driver can allocate an instance
> structure at probe time, and pass the pointer to devfs_register().
> When the device node is opened, file->private_data is initialised with
> that pointer. So the driver open() method already has a handle to the
> device instance structure, without any lookups being required.

That part of the scheme is good, but I'm still not convinced the lookup is
a big deal. To open a file, you still end up doing a lookup that matches
name to device (ie a dentry hash lookup). There's no reason opening a
device couldn't use a similarly fast (or even identical!) method without
requiring that the /dev dir be managed inside the kernel. In fact, I think
I earlier suggested it's possible to cache the lookup in the inode.

--
"Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.045 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site