Messages in this thread | | | From | (Miquel van Smoorenburg) | Subject | Re: dual pIII network / lockup problems | Date | 25 Nov 1999 18:21:20 +0100 |
| |
In article <cistron.Pine.LNX.4.10.KSI2mu3.9911251823320.26132-100000@nomad.ksi-linux.com>, Sergey Kubushin <ksi@ksi-linux.com> wrote: >BTW, is the stable kernel > 2.2.0 supposed to appear at all? Which does >build outta the box with full options enabled? And which does not contain >unresolved symbols in modules? And which does really work? The last stable >kernel which I did see was 2.1.125... It still runs on one of our primary >NS'es with several thousands zones:
We run 2.2.x kernels on several SMP boxes and uniprocessor boxes, including 4-way SMP Xeon ones. After we chased all the buggy hardware down (esp. RAM) they run fine. For example:
% uname -a Linux beast 2.2.13 #6 SMP Sat Oct 23 11:29:25 CEST 1999 i686 unknown % uptime 6:18pm up 28 days, 7:42, 3 users, load average: 3.75, 3.73, 3.73 % cat /proc/cpuinfo | egrep '(processor|model name)' processor : 0 model name : Pentium III (Katmai) processor : 1 model name : Pentium III (Katmai) processor : 2 model name : Pentium III (Katmai) processor : 3 model name : Pentium III (Katmai)
Mike. -- First things first, but not necessarily in that order.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |