Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Nov 1999 16:22:58 +0000 (GMT) | From | Eleonora Autore <> | Subject | Re: inode_lock "decorative"? |
| |
ah, ok. So can I remove the lock/unlock_kernel around get_empty_inode() everywhere, in particular in net/socket.c:sock_alloc() now?
(and especially the comment calling upon the name of my adversary around it - "Damn..." :)
Tigran.
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> Hello! > > > I.e. get_empty_inode() looks SMP-safe to me. What am I missing? > > You are missing that this code was merged in 2.3.15 and > was not updated since 2.3.18. 8) > > Alexey Kuznetsov >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |