lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux needs flexible security
Hi!

> > Ioctls should be banned. They make network transparent remote exec
> > hard, for example. Disabling all ioctls for user-level applications
> > should not hurt too much.... [clapity clap] Hmm, it will: console
> > operations are done using ioctls. Ok, disallowing ioctls is not possible.
>
> plan9 solved this with ctl files. i don't see why linux shouldn't move
> the same way in order to reap the benefits of distributable computing.
> how do systems like mosix work around ioctl problems?

Callbacks: you send ioctl over network and if remote side needs to
peek memory, sends "I want to peek at address" over network.
Pavel
PS: Yes, plan-9 like solution would be nicer. Even newioctl(fd, ptr,
length) would be nicer :-).
--
The best software in life is free (not shareware)! Pavel
GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans