lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux needs flexible security
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 10:10:16PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Ioctls should be banned. They make network transparent remote exec
> hard, for example. Disabling all ioctls for user-level applications
> should not hurt too much.... [clapity clap] Hmm, it will: console
> operations are done using ioctls. Ok, disallowing ioctls is not possible.

plan9 solved this with ctl files. i don't see why linux shouldn't move
the same way in order to reap the benefits of distributable computing.
how do systems like mosix work around ioctl problems?

--
Matthew Wilcox <willy@bofh.ai>
"Windows and MacOS are products, contrived by engineers in the service of
specific companies. Unix, by contrast, is not so much a product as it is a
painstakingly compiled oral history of the hacker subculture." - N Stephenson

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans