lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux needs flexible security
    On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 10:10:16PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > Ioctls should be banned. They make network transparent remote exec
    > hard, for example. Disabling all ioctls for user-level applications
    > should not hurt too much.... [clapity clap] Hmm, it will: console
    > operations are done using ioctls. Ok, disallowing ioctls is not possible.

    plan9 solved this with ctl files. i don't see why linux shouldn't move
    the same way in order to reap the benefits of distributable computing.
    how do systems like mosix work around ioctl problems?

    --
    Matthew Wilcox <willy@bofh.ai>
    "Windows and MacOS are products, contrived by engineers in the service of
    specific companies. Unix, by contrast, is not so much a product as it is a
    painstakingly compiled oral history of the hacker subculture." - N Stephenson

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.030 / U:30.364 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site