lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectmany "UDP: bad checksum."?
I get these alot nowadays under 2.3.25:

[excuse long lines]
Nov 2 23:23:19 narayan kernel: UDP: bad checksum. From 194.47.218.125:137 to 194.47.219.255:137 ulen 76
Nov 2 23:25:59 narayan kernel: UDP: bad checksum. From 194.47.216.228:137 to 194.47.219.255:137 ulen 76
Nov 2 23:27:00 narayan kernel: UDP: bad checksum. From 194.47.217.15:138 to 194.47.219.255:138 ulen 225
Nov 2 23:27:00 narayan kernel: UDP: bad checksum. From 194.47.217.227:138 to 194.47.219.255:138 ulen 232
Nov 2 23:27:44 narayan kernel: UDP: bad checksum. From 194.47.218.247:137 to 194.47.219.255:137 ulen 76
Nov 2 23:28:04 narayan kernel: UDP: bad checksum. From 194.47.219.90:138 to 194.47.219.255:138 ulen 209
Nov 2 23:29:37 narayan kernel: UDP: bad checksum. From 194.47.218.157:138 to 194.47.219.255:138 ulen 221

Given the port numbers, these are some kind of chatting between the
various windows boxen on my network. However, I don't remember seeing
the errors before, and find it unlikely that there be so many checksum
errors and only on packets of that kind (I do quite a lot of UDP
traffic). Since I don't use the protocol in question I haven't noticed
any possible adverse effects.

This is on a cheap ISA NE2000 clone on a 10BASET switched network.

--
Jakob Borg <jborg@df.lth.se> http://jb.replicant.nu
----
It is necessary to have purpose.
-- Alice #1, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.026 / U:0.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site