[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: a small doubt
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999 09:18:36 -0500 , 
Bret Indrelee <> wrote:
>Oliver Xymoron [] wrote:
>> Why don't we simply use an OOPS() macro that causes an oops in an
>> arch-specific way? And throw this in a generic place:
>What is wrong with just using the existing panic() from kernel.h?
>If there is information that panic() doesn't save which you would get with
>an OOPS message, then that is a problem with panic.

panic() is just a general message formatter, like printk() but with a
few more side effects ;). Causing an oops gets the registers and, more
to the point, gets them at the point of failure. Registers after you
have called another routine are much less useful.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.039 / U:9.536 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site