lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: access_ok inside kernelspace
    Date
    From
    Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.COM> said:
    > Actually, Ingo - there *is* one case where going through _syscallX() and
    > therefore int 0x80 from the kernel *is* the only way. This is when the
    > caller is a module. That is how I call sysfs() from BFS module.

    I don't understand this. A module is linked into the running kernel, and
    has access to all of it AFAIU, so I can't see any need for this contortion
    for modules. Maybe I'm just plain blind today...

    If it is really needed, some piece of magic should translate them to the
    plain calls when they are not modules to get rid of the overhead.
    --
    Dr. Horst H. von Brand mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl
    Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
    Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
    Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.041 / U:0.192 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site