[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: access_ok inside kernelspace

On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Tigran Aivazian wrote:

> this assumption is wrong - there are a couple of cases where sys_XXX()
> functions are called - sys_oldumount(), sys_creat().But there is no reason
> why they shouldn't be changed to use inlined _syscallX()'d things to be
> consistent, is there?

why this vendetta against using sys_ functions directly? We dont go
through a trap because in most cases that is unnecessery overhead. You are
not being logical i think.

-- mingo

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.042 / U:4.496 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site