Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Oct 1999 13:16:51 +0200 (CEST) | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: access_ok inside kernelspace |
| |
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> this assumption is wrong - there are a couple of cases where sys_XXX() > functions are called - sys_oldumount(), sys_creat().But there is no reason > why they shouldn't be changed to use inlined _syscallX()'d things to be > consistent, is there?
why this vendetta against using sys_ functions directly? We dont go through a trap because in most cases that is unnecessery overhead. You are not being logical i think.
-- mingo
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |