lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: HFS, QNXFS
Date
From
> > Both HFS and QNXFS has been in the kernel for quite some time, yet both
> > are flagged Experimental.
> >
> > Is this still the case? Are they considered more unstable than other
> > filesystems in the kernel? If they are considered unstable, HFS should
> > be made if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" ] ...
>
> I've used both and yes they are both still buggy and should remain marked
> as such. Is anybody still actively maintaining them?

HFS has a maintaier and seems pretty much rock solid in 2.2. The QNXfs is
still very experimental. Its a read only "solves the migration from QNX
to Linux" file system - no more.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.057 / U:0.524 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site