Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 10 Oct 1999 19:13:17 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device alloc ation) ) |
| |
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, David Ford wrote:
> Horst von Brand wrote: > > > > /etc/passwd, /etc/group > > > > Those describe users and groups, not permissions per se. > > consider them a dynamic group of permissions which identify who's got the > rights to what files (excuse me, anything resembling files which does also > include sockets and pipe creatures), and this is as dynamic as any other > config file.
UNIX 101 time. Again... "Who" in UNIX has _nothing_ with username. /etc/passwd and /etc/group is the database for login and friends - they use it to pick the identity by the external name. System knows nothing about usernames. Moreover, several usernames can match the same identity (e.g. with different shells being exec'ed by login(1)). Names are _only_ for output - as the matter of fact programs a-la ls do reverse lookup in /etc/passwd. Lookup by the number.
Folks, what about learning some _basics_ of the system you are working with? There is a lot of FAQs, after all. news.answers is (should be) on every newsserver and it's archived on rtfm.mit.edu. Frankly, it sucks. I mean, "we want to do something new and wonderful, so we can't be bothered to learn anything about those boring, old things" had been tried. Results are also known - so-called "New Technology". Are you sure that you are dealing with the right OS?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |