lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Porting vfork()
   Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 01:06:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Kenneth Albanowski <kjahds@kjahds.com>

On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Perry Harrington wrote:

> I discussed this issue with Linus as well, and concluded that
> vforking within a cloned process can be achieved via putting the
> sleep_on in the task structure. I'm going to be working on this
> tonight and I'll see what I can do.
I do think a sempahore would be appropriate to avoid the
possibility of recursion.

Last time I checked BSD doesn't even fully handle the recursive
vfork() case, and thus we should not need to either. Just make sure
the kernel retains it's own internal integrity in such a case, nothing
more.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans