Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 5 Jan 1999 20:16:48 -0800 | From | "David S. Miller" <> | Subject | Re: Drastic performance issue in ext2 v ffs |
| |
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 12:41:59 -0700 From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@jhereg.perl.com>
So, what might account for this embarrassingly dramatic disparity? Does BSD have an incedibly better inode cache? Is this a known bug? Is it fixed in the next release? :-)
We had a rather poor cache of file system objects in 2.0.x, yes.
For this reason, I'd be really interested if things are the same with one of the current 2.2.0 pre-release kernels.
Later, David S. Miller davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |