[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Should raw I/O be added to the kernel?

    On 22 Jan 1999 02:19:17 GMT, (H. Peter Anvin) said:

    > Actually, it is better than that: as long as the commit record cannot
    > pass the data records, you can roll back to a consistent state.

    Absolutely, but that's not the point: the point is that the Unix API
    does not allow applications to specify such a partial order on IO. Raw
    IO, O_SYNC and friends, and fsync() are about all an application can


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.028 / U:3.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site