[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Should raw I/O be added to the kernel?

On 22 Jan 1999 02:19:17 GMT, (H. Peter Anvin) said:

> Actually, it is better than that: as long as the commit record cannot
> pass the data records, you can roll back to a consistent state.

Absolutely, but that's not the point: the point is that the Unix API
does not allow applications to specify such a partial order on IO. Raw
IO, O_SYNC and friends, and fsync() are about all an application can


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.053 / U:21.868 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site