Messages in this thread | | | From | James Willard <> | Subject | Re: 2.2.0-final | Date | Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:20:38 -0500 (EST) |
| |
> >>>>> "x" == unknown: > >>>>> "y" == unknown: > >>>>> "Riley" == Riley Williams <rhw@BigFoot.Com> writes: > > x> 2. Is there a minimum RAM size for bzImage to work?
I have been running bzImage images on an 8mb system since 2.1.125 (it's now running 2.2.0-final).
> > y> Don't know. > > Riley> Neither do I, but given the above answers, I have to assume it > Riley> does indeed have a minimum RAM size, and that minimum is > Riley> somewhere between the 12M that I have and the 32M that you > Riley> have... > > For another datapoint, as of 2.1.115 bzImages boot on my handbook/486 > w/ 20M of ram. I've not installed a new kernel on it since August... > (Yup. My *notbook* has been up longer than my workstaton. :) >
James Willard james@cows.ml.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |