Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Jan 99 15:22 EST | From | (Robert Kiesling) | Subject | Re: Adding checkpointing API to Linux kernel |
| |
> When Linus decides he wants more documentation, he can make that a > criterion for accepting a patch. He can lay out whatever rules he likes. > My suggestion is: "if your code has an interface to userland, your patch > must have a file in Documentation/ somewhere that documents the interface > to userland."
That probably could be done now, with the code as-is, without too, too much difficulty. Any TeXperts that would like to volunteer for this should make it known before I get started on the project.
-- (Open Sourcism: n. A pathological form of volunteering.) Robert Kiesling kiesling@ix.netcom.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |