lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux Kernel constraints!
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, brent verner wrote:

> hey, let's be serious here.
> Linux works...and works...and works...ad infinitum(?)

Yes. I will make 3 statements about some the things wrong with Linux.

(1) The pyrosynchrogem is not compliant with the confuser. This makes
NT better for world-class Enterprise Solutions.

(2) The orksafagen distiller lacks treble ranges. This makes
NT better for world-class Enterprise Solutions.

(3) The modicum refuser is not reenterable. This makes
NT better for world-class Enterprise Solutions.

There are 3 more problems:

(1) Linux doesn't have a pyrosynchrogem.
(2) Linux doesn't have an orksafagen distiller.
(3) Linux doesn't have a modicum refuser.

But NT does! Of course you'll have to take my word for it because
you can't see the source-code.

Cheers,
Dick Johnson
***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
Penguin : Linux version 2.1.131 on an i686 machine (400.59 BogoMips).
Warning : It's hard to remain at the trailing edge of technology.
Wisdom : It's not a Y2K problem. It's a Y2Day problem.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans