lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux Kernel constraints!
    On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, brent verner wrote:

    > hey, let's be serious here.
    > Linux works...and works...and works...ad infinitum(?)

    Yes. I will make 3 statements about some the things wrong with Linux.

    (1) The pyrosynchrogem is not compliant with the confuser. This makes
    NT better for world-class Enterprise Solutions.

    (2) The orksafagen distiller lacks treble ranges. This makes
    NT better for world-class Enterprise Solutions.

    (3) The modicum refuser is not reenterable. This makes
    NT better for world-class Enterprise Solutions.

    There are 3 more problems:

    (1) Linux doesn't have a pyrosynchrogem.
    (2) Linux doesn't have an orksafagen distiller.
    (3) Linux doesn't have a modicum refuser.

    But NT does! Of course you'll have to take my word for it because
    you can't see the source-code.

    Cheers,
    Dick Johnson
    ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
    Penguin : Linux version 2.1.131 on an i686 machine (400.59 BogoMips).
    Warning : It's hard to remain at the trailing edge of technology.
    Wisdom : It's not a Y2K problem. It's a Y2Day problem.



    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.071 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site