lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    Subject2.2.0-final

    Hoya,

    there's now a 2.2.0-pre9 on ftp.kernel.org, and when you compile it it
    will call itself 2.2.0-final. The reason is fairly obvious: enough is
    enough, and I can't make pre-kernels forever, it just dilutes the whole
    idea. The only reason the tar-file is not called 2.2.0 is that I want to
    avoid having any embarrassing typos that cause it to not compile under
    reasonable configurations or something like that. Unreasonable
    configurations I no longer care about.

    Every program has bugs, and I'm sure there are still bugs in this. Get
    over it - we've done our best, and nobody ever believed that there
    wouldn't be 2.2.x kernels to fix problems as they come up, and delaying
    2.2.0 forever is not an option.

    I have a wedding anniversary and a company party coming up, so I'm taking
    a few days off - when I get back I expect to take this current 2.2.0-final
    and just remove the "-final" from the Makefile, and that will be it. I
    suspect somebody _will_ find something embarrassing enough that I would
    fix it too, but let's basically avoid planning on that.

    In short, before you post a bug-report about 2.2.0-final, I'd like you to
    have the following simple guidelines:

    "Is this something Linus would be embarrassed enough about that he would
    wear a brown paper bag over his head for a month?"

    and

    "Is this something that normal people would ever really care deeply
    about?"

    If the answer to either question is "probably not", then please consider
    just politely discussing it as a curiosity on the kernel mailing lists
    rather than even sending email about it to me: I've been too busy the last
    few weeks, and I'd really appreciate it if I could just forget the worries
    of a release for a few days..

    But if you find something hilariously stupid I did, feel free to share it
    with me, and we'll laugh about it together (and I'll avoid wearing the
    brown paper bag on my head during the month of February). Do we have a
    deal?

    I've seen people working on a 2.2.0 announcement, and I'm happy - I've
    been too busy to think straight, much less worry about details like that.
    If everything turns out ok, I'll have a few memorable bloopers in my
    mailbox but nothing worse than that, and I can sit down and actually read
    the announcement texts that people have been discussing.

    ObFeatures:
    - m68k sync
    - various minor driver fixes (irda, net drivers, scsi, video, isdn)
    - SGI Visual Workstation support
    - adjtimex update to the latest standards
    - vfat silly buglet fix
    - semaphores work on alpha again
    - drop the inline strstr() that gcc got wrong whatever we did
    - kswapd needed to be a bit more aggressive
    - minor TCP retransmission and delack fixes

    Until Monday,

    Linus


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.022 / U:90.520 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site