lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux
Date
From
In message <199901020833.DAA24808@saturn.cs.uml.edu>, "Albert D. Cahalan" 
write
s:
+-----
| to be mentioned anymore. When I see i386-redhat-linux on all the
| FSF stuff I compile, I will reconsider that decision. Until then,
| I hope others will join me in ignoring you as punishment.
+--->8

That's hypocrisy.

"i386-redhat-linux", eh? On S.u.S.E.? Debian? Stampede? Pacific Hi-Tech?
None of which are sufficiently different to require a different canonical
triplet. So all of them would end up being identified as "redhat"... and I
fail to see how identifying other Linux distributions as Red Hat (or Red Hat
wannabees) differs from your complaint about "GNU/Linux".

--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering KF8NH
We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.151 / U:0.624 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site