Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux | Date | Sat, 02 Jan 1999 09:54:42 -0500 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
In message <199901020833.DAA24808@saturn.cs.uml.edu>, "Albert D. Cahalan" write s: +----- | to be mentioned anymore. When I see i386-redhat-linux on all the | FSF stuff I compile, I will reconsider that decision. Until then, | I hope others will join me in ignoring you as punishment. +--->8
That's hypocrisy.
"i386-redhat-linux", eh? On S.u.S.E.? Debian? Stampede? Pacific Hi-Tech? None of which are sufficiently different to require a different canonical triplet. So all of them would end up being identified as "redhat"... and I fail to see how identifying other Linux distributions as Red Hat (or Red Hat wannabees) differs from your complaint about "GNU/Linux".
-- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering KF8NH We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |