> 
>    From: Jakub Jelinek <jj@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
>    Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 08:37:54 +0100 (CET)
> 
>    Also, if you add PG_highmem, I bet current page_alloc will suck
>    badly (even the way how is PG_dma done now is very unefficient).
> 
> No, it's actually pretty simple.  The difference is that PG_dma "must"
> get a PG_dma page.  Whereas PG_highmem says such a page is "OK" if
> that is what you happen to find.

Yep, but I guess you'd like to get a PG_highmem page if you can handle it,
so that for other allocations there are still enough lowmems.
So yes, it could work with some effort, but the page_alloc changes would be
handy even for that.

Cheers,
    Jakub
___________________________________________________________________
Jakub Jelinek | jj@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz | http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz
Administrator of SunSITE Czech Republic, MFF, Charles University
___________________________________________________________________
UltraLinux  |  http://ultra.linux.cz/  |  http://ultra.penguin.cz/
Linux version 2.2.0-pre7 on a sparc64 machine (3958.37 BogoMips)
___________________________________________________________________

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/