[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: Building .config into the kernel
> Mitchell Blank Jr
> Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> > Trouble is, that doesn't patch cleanly. Redhat distributes patches
> > along with pristine source in the SRPMs, allowing you to upgrade the
> > source and still use the patches. If you have multiple
> patches fighting
> > over the EXTRAVERSION line, or Linus decides to remove it after the
> > -pre series, you get rejects.
> Have one of the patchs in the SRPM just update the EXTRAVERSION line.
> As someone already pointed out, people who build their own
> kernel (either
> from .tar.bz2 or by playing RPM games) probably know what is in their
> kernel and can report it themselves. The biggest need is
> differentiating
> between 2.2.0, 2.2.0-redhat, 2.2.0-suse, 2.2.0-debian, ...

If you want to do that, have the distributers change UTS_SYSNAME, not
appending the dist name to the version. This would make more sense, IMHO.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.156 / U:1.072 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site