Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:35:51 +0100 (CET) | From | Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <> | Subject | Re: Official kernel stance on EGCS? |
| |
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Aaron Tiensivu wrote:
> I know that egcs is generally frowned upon for compiling 2.0.xx and I know > that fix-ups have been done to 2.1 to make it compatible with egcs. Right now > I'm grabbing the latest egcs cvs tree and was wondering if the more recent > versions are a valid testbed with respect to the kernel? > > Will 2.2 freak out if I'm not using gcc 2.7.2.3?
It won't - I've been compiling the kernel with pgcc (which is in turn based on egcs) for ages. The latest egcs snapshots might still make problems because of some asm changes; egcs 1.1.1 works.
LLaP bero
-- Windows 98 supports real multitasking - it can boot and crash simultaneously. *** Anyone sending unwanted advertising e-mail to this address will be charged $25 for network traffic and computing time. By extracting my address from this message or its header, you agree to these terms.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |