[lkml]   [1999]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Results: pre6 vs pre6+zlatko's_patch vs pre5 vs arcavm13

    On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > Steve, could you try the image test in 128Mbyte with this my new patch
    > (arca-vm-14) applyed against clean 2.2.0-pre6?

    Please don't do this.

    > do {
    > int result;
    > - tsk->swap_address = address + PAGE_SIZE;
    > result = try_to_swap_out(tsk, vma, address, pte, gfp_mask);
    > + address += PAGE_SIZE;
    > + tsk->swap_address = address;

    The above is horribly broken, and should be killed on sight.

    "swap_address" _must_ be set before try_to_swap_out(), because otherwise
    when try-to_swap_out() sleeps any other processes trying to free will
    start from the wrong address - unfairly penalizing the process in
    question, as the accessed bits have been cleared.

    If the above help, it only does so because it is unfair - which _can_ help
    simply because other processes run faster.

    It looks like you tried to optimize away one add, at the expense of
    getting the whole algorithm wrong.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.019 / U:78.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site