lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Very poor TCP/SACK performance
On Tue, 8 Sep 1998, Felix von Leitner wrote:

| While we are at it: that would explain the poor PPP throughput if the
| TCP end is a Linux system, too! Does IRIX 6 support SACK, perchance?
|
|
| Why is Linux using SACK, anyway?
| Stevens refers to it like "yeah, the BSD people implemented it once, but
| it didn't work so it was discarded and is now obsolete".
|
| And, you know, if Stevens says so, I'd be tempted to just accept this as
| God given and be done with it. What was the reason to add SACK support
| to Linux? Almost no system under the sun seems to support it, anyway.
| Right?

Nope, Solaris 2.6 has a patch that supports SACK, and I believe that the
new M$ Winsock 2.0 supports SACK.

Overall, SACK would be beneficial to an environment with high
bandwidth-latency product, esp in a satellite link.

lf.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.160 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site