lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [TIMINGS] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower
    On Mon, 7 Sep 1998, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    >On Sat, 5 Sep 1998, Bruno Haible wrote:
    >
    >>Here are timings of the three alternatives, for the "common" case.
    >
    >The standard kernel profiling is really not realiable in the short term so

    No, my real profiling is not what you want. You need that the number say
    you how much time the kernel passed in such functions and not how many
    times such function is been recalled.

    But why not account the time (or better cpu cyles) without use profiling
    at all? I don' t think that the standard profiling can give us realiable
    numbers in some minutes of testing...

    Andrea[s] Arcangeli


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.019 / U:58.960 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site