[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2us Interrupt latency's for Linux 2.0.xx
On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, George wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Sep 1998, Perry Harrington wrote:
> >I'm wondering, can the APIC be enabled for UP boards? If so, why
> >doesn't Linux enable the APIC as the default interrupt controller
> >for single processor Pentium+ systems?
> Single processor boards don't have an APIC or IO-APIC. If you read
> Documentation/SMP.txt, the note:
> o Separate IO-APIC from SMP.
> means it's on the agenda to allow the IO-APIC to be used by uniprocessor
> kernels running on SMP boards. (which, incidently, NT 4.0 can do.)
> -George

If NT uses the IO-APIC then why is it limited to the 16 normal INTs?
Furthermore, if they use IO-APIC how could they screw up their int
handling so badily their their int latency is so high dispite the ultra
fast IO-APIC.

Perhaps NT 4.0 uses IO-APIC in that it detects it's presence.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.073 / U:0.476 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site