lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: jitterbug
Date
On Wed, 30 Sep 1998 03:01:59 -0700, 
"David S. Miller" <davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com> wrote:
>What people have misses is that jitterbug is not being looked at
>during code freeze.

With respect, what is also missing is a statement that we should (or
should not) be using jitterbug. It is a fairly well kept secret, no
mention at all anywhere in the source or the FAQ. A search of the
archives for linux-kernel picked up a few references but those only
only mention it in passing. Even if you know the URL for jitterbug,
there is no statement on the main page about it being inactive.

Note: jitterbug or something like it is a good idea. It just needs to
be more visible and official.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.068 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site