[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Differences between FreeBSD and Linux system call mechanism
> > I'm starting to wonder. Terry normally knows what he is talking about,
> I was under the impression he just used big words and prayed 8)

Nice Ad Hominim. I mistype "call-gate" for "trap-gate", and now
I'm a religious zealot. See my other posting.

> > 3) I'm not sure about Terrys definition of "efficient", but if he means
> > required CPU cycles I thought that there were not that many left in
> > Linux that FreeBSD could be better. Has anybody hard numbers for both
> > kernels?
> lmbench is your friend. Im sure Larry McVoy can provide

LMBench is a set of microbenchmarks that aren't very predictive of
real-world load characteristics. The best predictor of real-world
load characteristics is previous measurements in the real-world
under identical load (ie: if it too 500 cycles yesterday, it will
take 500 cycles today).

Terry Lambert
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.100 / U:0.136 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site