[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Interesting scheduling times - NOT
    Larry McVoy wrote:
    > Just to put to rest the idea that maybe the median is covering things
    > up, here's the full set of data, note the small standard deviation:
    > 2 7.58 (7.74 7.65 7.63 7.60 7.60 7.58 7.58 7.58 7.55 7.54 7.53)
    > Here's the same thing with each run taking 500 milliseconds (so a total of
    > about 6 seconds of run time):
    > 2 7.73 (8.38 8.14 8.13 8.00 7.94 7.73 7.62 7.60 7.46 7.33 7.04)

    Just to scroll things back a few days here guys: (I just noticed this
    message in my backlog)

    Anybody else notice that Larry's results are monotonic on both sets of
    data ? The chances against monotonicity for each run are 2^9 to 1

    This says VERY loudly that these are not random differences - something
    else is happening. That something else appears to dwarf the random
    effects that are probably present, because monotonicity isn't violated
    even a single time.

    Then compare first and last entries for the second run and you get a
    non-trivial difference...

    The fact that the times are varying even until the end of each run says
    that something hasn't equilibrated (probably a cache thing) and that
    drawing conclusions from the results is subject to some dangers.

    And yeah, the median certainly covered *that* thing up, no?



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.020 / U:9.552 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site