lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: how to deal with hosts that are down
Date
>>>>> "Brandon" == Brandon S Allbery KF8NH <allbery@kf8nh.apk.net> writes:
> Sun beat you to it; it's called nscd. I understand there's a version for

No. I know about nscd, but it does just what I said I wasn't interested in:
it solves the special case of DNS accesses (well maybe a few other services
as well). What I have in mind is an OS-wide solution, so that if a host is
down and someone tries to access it via resolv/ftp/telnet/http/younameit they
will immediately get a timeout (since the host is know to be down because of an
earlier timeout, why wait 2 minutes before returning the timeout to the
application ?). I'm quite wawre that I haven't thought this out in detail
and that it isn't quite so easy to solve, but I'm fairly sure something
can be done.

Ideally, this should be coupled with a network-wide service (call it NSS for
network-status-service) that would record what is up and what isn't. This is
of course tricky business since the NSS server might go down :-(

This came to my mind when people mentionned the idea of keeping the tcp-window
size from one connection to the next.


Stefan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.024 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site