lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Today Linus redesigns the networking driver interface (was Re: tulip driver in ...)
Date
On Tue, 22 Sep 1998 21:01:34 +1000, 
Richard Gooch <rgooch@atnf.csiro.au> wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:27:36 +1000,
>> Richard Gooch <rgooch@atnf.csiro.au> wrote:
>> >The simple rule: "if you haven't registered/marked active a BH, then
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> >you aren't going to trigger BH processing, so don't worry about it"
>> >seems like the right thing.
>
>Eh? do_bottom_half() will run *any* BH that is marked. So what's the
>problem? Anything that registers a BH will of course have to mark it:
>that's the whole point.

Original suggestion implied that the interrupt handler would *not*
mark_bh() in all cases. Source of confusion :( found.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.144 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site