lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: STREAMS: interface versus implementation
On Fri, Sep 18, 1998 at 06:53:38PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> .36 pre has a long syscall table so the space exists for the slots,
> and exports some internal select() functions needed to do poll().
> So its actual impact on the "normal" linux kernel is close to zilch

If this being the case, then is it not possible to accommodate the
LiS people by shipping STREAMS with the kernel?

Sure, STREAMS might suck - but thats not a good enough reason to
exclude it from the kernel if it does indeed provide benefits to a
non-zero percentage of people.

Although, I think we are still waiting on _necessary_ uses of
STREAMS other than Netware aren't we?




-cw


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.056 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site