[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: AVL and hash in memory management
:    Now that I think of it, is the balancing cost important
: in the common case? When we have only 4 to 6 VMAs, we
: won't be balancing that much.
: The current fork+exit latency is humming close to ~200usec on the
: UltraSparc, every cycle counts at this point.

Far be it from to put down performance work, but I think you are missing
the point. When I put that test into lmbench, I put in fork/exit
vs for/exec("/tmp/foo")/exit vs fork/exec("sh -c /tmp/foo")/exit.
The point was /not/ that fork/exit are too slow but that execing /bin/sh
-c /tmp/foo was very slow. The first can be fairly easily speeded up,
but so what? It doesn't happen in any performance critical path that
I've seen. The latter is much harder to speed up, but it's where the
real rewards are.

Short summary: don't worry about shaving 10 usecs off fork/exit when you
can shave 10,000 usecs off /bin/sh -c.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.038 / U:2.684 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site