[lkml]   [1998]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: showstopper race condition in sync() ??? [2.1.119|120]
On Thu, Sep 17, 1998 at 01:03:11PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> > >What would be the consequence of putting a big spinlock around the whole
> > >sync_dquots routine ? We would be unable to sync() the quota on two
> >
> > If you have a K6 as you said putting a spinlock can' t help you to avoid
> > the dquota deadlock.
> Ugh. Pardon my ignorance, but what does have CPU type to do with
> generic code, such as spinlocks() and quotas?

Maybe SMP usage? No SMP, means no second CPU to release the offending
deadlock dquota thingy

Met vriendelijke groet,
Pauline Middelink
PGP Key fingerprint = DE 6B D0 D9 19 AD A7 A0 58 A3 06 9D B6 34 39 E2
For more details look at my website

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.055 / U:7.092 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site