Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: SYSRQ accidents | Date | Tue, 01 Sep 1998 06:37:35 -0300 | From | "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <> |
| |
In message <Pine.LNX.4.00.9809011733150.12871-100000@stoli.spirits.org.au>, Nat han Hand writes: +----- | On Tue, 1 Sep 1998, Guest section DW wrote: | > From: Nathan Hand <nathanh@chirp.com.au> | > On Fri, 28 Aug 1998, David Meyer wrote: | > > Am I the first one to aim for "k" and accidently hit "l" ? eh? I just | > > wanted to saK my current TTY, not destroy my system! | > SAK isn't supposed to be a neat toy. It's for developers. | > Hmm - sounds like someone who doesnt have a clue what SAK is for. | Apparently myself and 1,000 kernel developers. That is, unless you | think that "Kernel Hacking" applies to non-kernel developers. +--->8
Secure Attention Key is a security feature, not a development feature.
-- brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering KF8NH carnegie mellon university
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |