lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)
On Mon, 10 Aug 1998, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Yes, but you must admit it might have sounded like you were claiming
> > that a fully populated SCSI /dev along with every conceivable psuedodevice
> > is peanuts, and noone cares.
> >
> > I kind of like having to search through ONLY the device nodes I have.
>
> Which are all you need to have in /dev. Can you try using facts in your
> reasoning. It makes it easier to find a logical conclusion

Then, instead of solving the problem of having enormous amounts of SCSI
disk in one system, we ignore it and just don't have a fully populated
/dev.

Hmm... Or, I personally weed out the 99.9999% I don't need myself, and
add as necessary.

That to me sounds broken.

-Shawn
<=========== America Held Hostage ===========>
Day 2027 for the poor and the middle class.
Day 2046 for the rich and the dead.
895 days remaining in the Raw Deal.
<============================================>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.534 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site