Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 9 Aug 1998 18:39:47 -0500 (CDT) | From | Shawn Leas <> | Subject | Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) |
| |
On Mon, 10 Aug 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Yes, but you must admit it might have sounded like you were claiming > > that a fully populated SCSI /dev along with every conceivable psuedodevice > > is peanuts, and noone cares. > > > > I kind of like having to search through ONLY the device nodes I have. > > Which are all you need to have in /dev. Can you try using facts in your > reasoning. It makes it easier to find a logical conclusion
Then, instead of solving the problem of having enormous amounts of SCSI disk in one system, we ignore it and just don't have a fully populated /dev.
Hmm... Or, I personally weed out the 99.9999% I don't need myself, and add as necessary.
That to me sounds broken.
-Shawn <=========== America Held Hostage ===========> Day 2027 for the poor and the middle class. Day 2046 for the rich and the dead. 895 days remaining in the Raw Deal. <============================================>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |