Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Aug 1998 00:45:43 -0500 (CDT) | From | "Edward S. Marshall" <> | Subject | Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) |
| |
On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Terry L Ridder wrote: > Concerning the >2GB files on Intel hardware I agree that is a hard one. > Which is why I have been bringing it up. Are we as a Community going to > consider the requirements that Oracle & Informix support bring to the > table?
Just to throw in a silly tidbit of info: the last time we spoke to the folks at Oracle, they didn't support >2G files on Solaris 2.6 yet. This was about two months ago. How long has 2.6 been out? (Actually, shouldn't 2.7 be released soonish?)
While it's important to support, I don't think it'll be critical. Oracle, at the very least, handles multiple files for a single dataset invisibly, so multiple 2G files aren't a real problem. We've needed to do that with a few databases where I work (a Solaris 2.x shop).
Just to put the whole 'we have to support Oracle and Informix' argument into perspective.
-- -------------------. emarshal at logic.net .--------------------------------- Edward S. Marshall `-----------------------' http://www.logic.net/~emarshal/
Linux labyrinth 2.1.114 #1 SMP Tue Aug 4 02:06:20 CDT 1998 i586 unknown 12:40am up 1 day, 4:51, 4 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |