[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: devfs compatibility
Alex Buell writes:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 1998, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> > 0 whole disk
> > 1 first PC partition
> > 2 second PC partition
> > 3 third PC partition
> > 4 fourth PC partition
> Richard, how does devfs supports the rather limited and braindead primary
> and extended partitions for Intel platforms? If we use extended
> partitions, then we can have unlimited number of partitions (I think), but
> on the other hand if we use all four primary partitions, we're stuck with
> that. The answer is to only use primaries for systems that needs it (i.e
> MSDOG/WinDOG95 et. al), and use extended for Linux.

I don't do anything particular for extended partitions. I use the
existing numbering scheme in Linux. I don't see this as a devfs



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.029 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site