Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:04:13 -0500 (CDT) | From | Shawn Leas <> | Subject | Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???) |
| |
On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Terry L Ridder wrote: > > Not that I advocate devfs, but there is no denying it does sidestep > > the issue quite nicely, but then again, there may be other > > alternatives not so closely tied to the kernel. > > Alternatives are nice to have and alternatives need to be looked at.
Ok, what might be a better idea? What might be a better approach? If you can think of a better approach, I'm certainly all ears... Really, I mean it!
-Shawn <=========== America Held Hostage ===========> Day 2023 for the poor and the middle class. Day 2042 for the rich and the dead. 899 days remaining in the Raw Deal. <============================================>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
| |