lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: no problems w/2.0.35/6x86L P166 (was Re: CyrixInstead ?)
From
Date
"PD" == Paul Duncan <p_duncan@efn.org> writes:

PD> Subject says it all. No detection problems with kernel 2.0.35, Cyrix
PD> 6x86 P166 processor (except it could be faster :)..).

Well, I have. I included the output of the detected CPU (once I compiled it
as 486) so that ppl can look at the type of CPU I've got. I believe that
there are different revisions of that CPU, whith different
features/behaviour.

The fact that we both have a 6x86 166+, one is detected and one not means that
it is worth reporting. Note again that I have a IBM 6x86 though...

--
Nicolai P Guba, BSc(Hons) BT Networks and Systems
Managerial Professional Grade Applied Research and Technology
BT Research Laboratories Distributed Systems Group
Martlesham Heath, Suffolk IP5 3RE pp B54/R73

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:43    [W:0.069 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site