[lkml]   [1998]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PnP

On 26 Aug 1998, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> >
> > Quite frankly, PnP as a standard sucks. Anything that just reads the PnP
> > standard and tries to force that on Linux will be most definitely ignored.
> I've taken freedom to put your words of wisdom on the small page I'm
> maintaining. I hope you have nothing against it, but if you do... :)

That's fine. If somebody quotes me, I'd like to clarify that one thing
that I want to happen is that the Linux "PnP" code should really make
sense from a completely non-PC-world standpoint too.

So what I'm looking for is more of a "framework for autodetection" where
PnP would strictly be relegated to just be one particular way of finding
out information for the larger framework.

(And think of "larger" not in code-size, but as a "concept" thing)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.117 / U:1.488 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site